Re: [PATCH 1/3] emacs: modify help message for notmuch-search-line-faces to reflect...

diff --git a/cb/83babe65cd006fc2199ddcfd3b5cedb65a797f b/cb/83babe65cd006fc2199ddcfd3b5cedb65a797f
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..67eb1e8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/cb/83babe65cd006fc2199ddcfd3b5cedb65a797f
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9669431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:47:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 7GwH4hp3QHVS for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:47:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BFC431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:47:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FDD2E50D21;\r
+       Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:47:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (unknown [76.89.193.65])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F702E50D6A;\r
+       Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:47:02 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id C9BFF9C2; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:47:01 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>,\r
+ Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>,\r
+       Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] emacs: modify help message for\r
+       notmuch-search-line-faces to reflect preferred "deleted" tag name.\r
+In-Reply-To: <m2ehrotg29.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+References: <87vcoaywyu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+       <87iph06h72.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+       <87ty0k4v5o.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <m2ehrotg29.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+129~gfe33a4f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:46:17 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87ehro44ba.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 05:47:08 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Sun, Apr 15 2012, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:\r
+> id:"1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net"\r
+>\r
+> Does just "delete" -> "deleted" change: the only question I have left\r
+> is that should that be left as is, this change made, or just drop\r
+> the "delete" coloring altogether ?\r
+\r
+Sorry, yes, I suppose this patch should still be applied.  Excludes for\r
+"deleted" are the default, I believe, so if we are going to refer to it\r
+in documentation we should probably be consistent.\r
+\r
+On Sun, Apr 15 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
+> On Sun, Apr 15 2012, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+>> I think the rest of the series (which provides keybindings for\r
+>> adding/removing the delete tag to messages/threads) is worthwhile\r
+>> particularly now the exclude stuff is fairly complete (feedback at the\r
+>> time looked positive).\r
+>\r
+> Sorry, I wish I could have purged all of these series from the list.\r
+> After a very protracted discussion on the topic it was decided that\r
+> notmuch will not support any delete tagging operations.  Users who wish\r
+> to do so can add support on their own:\r
+\r
+I think my reaction here was a little strong.  I'm not remembering how I\r
+got the impression that there was more opposition to adding delete\r
+keybindings than there was support.  I suppose now that excludes work so\r
+well one (not me) might consider revisiting the issue.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPi7IpAAoJEO00zqvie6q8GXIP/iMAjM3+Ho1Gk4yT3HLVTXTp\r
+ZWazCyPjQnt7lvB/nf4tDR9CWApY4xVlscQ1JW5cbcJqQLGpxHSPr8shmAJHQgti\r
+LkGdxw38MMBRYTnNiA6VoET8Sgey3wR/dj/qM/PkpIHlYO2bxWpdB0M6apl7/Etf\r
+uguLk7/mNbvhN5L3u88kSXTOwNRDF6YxPra7pNvn9M0EsQhPQUFoj/zLOcOoT7oP\r
+4yEkqtPReVoJLBeI8B+E1uizSR8DeCLdujmwDUkwJuHMI8i9KIKfu/p1Orv6lVTa\r
++/t8UhokZGNSQErX5lJSKSO9Q82JRswGVBA8bN/cdfGlbGA9D+C4fP5PSNRAc1Qn\r
++wwabp7DRyokYJuzLz+0zEFalaBKxVsdP1aFYr/dKS6Yuo2dD3N83j1GRAahKtF/\r
+LgmL5L0IiHTRbspmlSDSLitzbu3fnWnTF7ZjzreEq63HJqA/kuC7g8Mx8D8W1hLn\r
+JUI7Vj2RWISMAzlUQI9xC2NMkPdUjB7gqftpTnylNSSdlpBcMISrzU3kl/ANSKrZ\r
+d/3ckSt4or8LvGbiKbN1snAQVAosRSR6cAVNyE2WFWoIAW0F2BCJ05pc3N4UPiy2\r
+xNQS5pUxdt+qT5Siy2NYZP9l60u8dVSsDiYEQZDKn/tsFfC0yNlJdUPbmMcT1lta\r
+sNHMK0qHiSuJk2I/v2JP\r
+=1gK6\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r