Re: [PATCH 6/6] man: document notmuch count --output=files

diff --git a/3d/5403e7828a6c39fcaacb16a775f5b1f21478bf b/3d/5403e7828a6c39fcaacb16a775f5b1f21478bf
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..67919fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3d/5403e7828a6c39fcaacb16a775f5b1f21478bf
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B772431FBF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 23:14:48 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id z-jkgG6E8qnn for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 26 May 2013 23:14:42 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00348431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 23:14:41 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1UgqhO-0001M3-78; Mon, 27 May 2013 07:14:31 +0100\r
+Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1UgqhN-00058K-Uw; Mon, 27 May 2013 07:14:26 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>,\r
+       notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] man: document notmuch count --output=files\r
+In-Reply-To: <878v31l0mq.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+References: <cover.1368467532.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+       <f17c2b077aa75783444706e8de731a270fd6ba9c.1368467532.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+       <878v31l0mq.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+255~gff3cc55 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 07:14:24 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87bo7xj6f3.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: e2ff07298de97c913479003f39938cbd (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -0.1\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: /\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored -0.1 points.\r
+       Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       * -0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 06:14:48 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:\r
+\r
+> Other than the bikeshed about starting from zero instead of one, and not\r
+> being completely happy with the option name --duplicate (but not being\r
+> inspired to suggest a better one), this series looks OK to me.\r
+>\r
+> It seems like it would be quite useful to query based on the number of\r
+> duplicates, but that is a much more ambitious task, I think.\r
+\r
+This series basically looks good to me too. I agree with all of the\r
+above points though. \r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r