--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <aclements@csail.mit.edu>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F01431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 16:20:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id wEFeMyPTomFy for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun, 5 Oct 2014 16:20:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing.csail.mit.edu (outgoing.csail.mit.edu [128.30.2.149])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C6C431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 16:20:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from [104.131.20.129] (helo=awakeningjr)\r
+ by outgoing.csail.mit.edu with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)\r
+ (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <aclements@csail.mit.edu>)\r
+ id 1Xav61-0000LQ-4R; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:20:09 -0400\r
+Received: from amthrax by awakeningjr with local (Exim 4.84)\r
+ (envelope-from <aclements@csail.mit.edu>)\r
+ id 1Xav60-0004dB-LS; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:20:08 -0400\r
+Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 19:20:08 -0400\r
+From: Austin Clements <aclements@csail.mit.edu>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] lib: Refactor _notmuch_database_link_message\r
+Message-ID: <20141005232008.GB7970@csail.mit.edu>\r
+References: <1412345958-8278-1-git-send-email-aclements@csail.mit.edu>\r
+ <1412345958-8278-3-git-send-email-aclements@csail.mit.edu>\r
+ <87k34fot7d.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+In-Reply-To: <87k34fot7d.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 23:20:18 -0000\r
+\r
+Quoth David Bremner on Oct 05 at 9:45 am:\r
+> Austin Clements <aclements@csail.mit.edu> writes:\r
+> > + void *local = talloc_new (NULL);\r
+> \r
+> What's the advantage of using a local talloc context here? Is this just\r
+> an optimization?\r
+\r
+There are a few allocations that wind up going in to this local\r
+context because of the call to _consume_metadata_thread_id, so it's\r
+more convenient to free this one context on return from\r
+_notmuch_database_link_message than to worry about tracking these\r
+various allocations.\r