Re: [PATCH 0/2]

diff --git a/d9/4723bf6d98111cd7dab2b27d6cbd1145043bf8 b/d9/4723bf6d98111cd7dab2b27d6cbd1145043bf8
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..719d1e1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/d9/4723bf6d98111cd7dab2b27d6cbd1145043bf8
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AF8429E35\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  3 Feb 2014 06:25:13 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id v6oZBsHkJaHv for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon,  3 Feb 2014 06:25:05 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 558C3429E2F\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  3 Feb 2014 06:25:05 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+       id 1WAKSK-0001p9-16; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:25:00 -0400\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 31247 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 03 Feb 2014\r
+       14:24:55 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2]\r
+In-Reply-To: <cover.1391423201.git.wking@tremily.us>\r
+References: <877g9chbay.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+ <cover.1391423201.git.wking@tremily.us>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+56~gb9c3d8e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:24:54 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <877g9cjmtl.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:25:16 -0000\r
+\r
+"W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> writes:\r
+\r
+>\r
+> p.s. I checked a few earlier patches on the list and didn't see\r
+> reviewer CCs.  On the other hand, I didn't see any Reply-To headers\r
+> either, so I'm CCing my reviewers to be safe ;).  Let me know if the\r
+> convention is to not CC reviewers, and I'll restrict future\r
+> submissions to notmuch@.\r
+\r
+I would say this list is CC friendly. Most (?) of us read it with\r
+notmuch, and don't see the CC's as extra messages.\r
+\r
+d\r
+\r
+\r