--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18224431FBD\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 13:19:48 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id twFZ78NhKaeE for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun, 2 Feb 2014 13:19:40 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-ea0-f176.google.com (mail-ea0-f176.google.com\r
+ [209.85.215.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86A99431FBC\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 13:19:40 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by mail-ea0-f176.google.com with SMTP id h14so3329646eaj.7\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 13:19:36 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
+ h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references\r
+ :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
+ bh=mWKwewTUcwryipPA/d7EQGMleBKulBXMb3zXMtP49wc=;\r
+ b=ajPyjaDmKmzaHKkZ+02fGI6+fPlprjuIJZ8uBLucI5FAkNcFJmjId5x91LmnYZXi3/\r
+ A5362YLFqxPE39bkkl6rDXtTdoreziam4sHc/pOMq/xRwXJATYRsLU8fDhIpf8fV14Dm\r
+ 64pCvzc+cZ2oAo/y4enHZGDNf8koPVv5Mi1tnWoLnGGuclk3kGF2HRiWYxnalO7iG0kv\r
+ 3j2a6sgATDR9Psx2SNZjrP8vIixe2P5vhuJlMSdN1KFenykfWZ2e4fAI5APyet8P31kz\r
+ XhSrUueZA6/2McT8KIvec6kasGhs0bOb+FlN0HK1S949FlpYzyYDlQ+ziLlIwkp+rqAi\r
+ ahdg==\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQnFwm3eQ63EG48wEwE/BKAluQMHNmYJoDFMn1VoQtdlmRu6bpfOfzvDhTwTLXDq6qvaXwdq\r
+X-Received: by 10.14.88.131 with SMTP id a3mr3399354eef.64.1391375976603;\r
+ Sun, 02 Feb 2014 13:19:36 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw2-58c36f-91.dhcp.inet.fi.\r
+ [88.195.111.91])\r
+ by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k6sm66566142eep.17.2014.02.02.13.19.34\r
+ for <multiple recipients>\r
+ (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);\r
+ Sun, 02 Feb 2014 13:19:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,\r
+ Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure: only install bash completion if supported\r
+In-Reply-To: <878utt1b9s.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+References: <1391359677-12497-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org>\r
+ <877g9dqup5.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <878utt1b9s.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+44~ge3b4cd9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 23:19:33 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <87vbwxw6u2.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 21:19:48 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sun, 02 Feb 2014, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> writes:\r
+>\r
+>> This LGTM (untested)\r
+>\r
+> I did test it, at least completely removing bash completion works as\r
+> expected. \r
+>\r
+> Unfortunately --with-bash-completion does not override this test because\r
+> the order things are processed. Do you think this is a bug? I wondered\r
+> if users that "know what they are doing" (TM) might want to force\r
+> installation even though the pkg-config test fails.\r
+\r
+I thought it was a feature, not a bug, but I'm fine either way.\r
+\r
+BR,\r
+Jani.\r