Re: [PATCH] Add a few tests for searching LWN emails.

diff --git a/3c/690e28ae70bbcfe3df30ac423db4c7db9f2bdc b/3c/690e28ae70bbcfe3df30ac423db4c7db9f2bdc
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..591fbfd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3c/690e28ae70bbcfe3df30ac423db4c7db9f2bdc
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+Return-Path: <thomas@schwinge.name>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBC2431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 02:55:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 0XzYKvgTqTpL for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 30 Jan 2011 02:55:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de\r
+       [80.67.31.28])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DA6431FB5\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 02:55:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from [87.180.51.55] (helo=stokes.schwinge.homeip.net)\r
+       by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.68)\r
+       (envelope-from <thomas@schwinge.name>) id 1PjUvu-0003qB-Ox\r
+       for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:55:03 +0100\r
+Received: (qmail 17400 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2011 10:54:47 -0000\r
+Received: from kepler.schwinge.homeip.net (192.168.111.7)\r
+       by stokes.schwinge.homeip.net with QMQP; 30 Jan 2011 10:54:47 -0000\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 3753 invoked by uid 1000);\r
+       Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:54:47 -0000\r
+From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name>\r
+To: Matthieu Lemerre <racin@free.fr>, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>,\r
+       notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a few tests for searching LWN emails.\r
+In-Reply-To: <87r5bvn7rk.fsf@free.fr>\r
+References: <1296124309-20072-1-git-send-email-thomas@schwinge.name>\r
+       <87vd18n6j9.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87r5bvn7rk.fsf@free.fr>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-33-g665f77b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+       (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:54:46 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <874o8qpsp5.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-Df-Sender: thomas@schwinge.name\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:55:04 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+Hallo!\r
+\r
+On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:45:19 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre <racin@free.fr> wrote:\r
+> I had already reported this problem in id:"87ipzvk2xh.fsf@free.fr".\r
+\r
+Oh, I see!\r
+\r
+> Recent versions of GMime perform more robust parsing that fix the\r
+> problem, but unfortunately debian only ship old versions of the package.\r
+\r
+In this case, I'm not eager to work around this issue in notmuch -- this\r
+would only complicate the local code, and yet would be redundand in some\r
+months.  (Your mileage may vary.)  That is, we already do rely on the\r
+GMIME library for this parsing (etc.), so that's the place where this\r
+issue needs to be fixed (and has been).  Hopefully, after the imminent\r
+Debian release, the version of the library will be updated, or someone\r
+(we, I guess) will propose backporting this patch, and get it accepted.\r
+(Which may be non-trivial, as that wasn't a simple patch, but instead\r
+sort of a parser re-write, as I understood it.)\r
+\r
+\r
+> I don't believe we will be able to make all people from whom we receive\r
+> email always send RFC2822-compliant email addresses :)\r
+\r
+Indeed.  :-)\r
+\r
+\r
+Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe,\r
+ Thomas\r
+\r
+\r
+PS: Matthieu, interesting how peoples' (that is, our) paths cross again.\r
+:-)\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNRUN2AAoJEGe3hdm9kOiikI4IAJIDMR5n6pHXiq6yp5csRByZ\r
+iz7TjjX6mw8nURjUzM3Y2G1dBT3UZ/8QrqTQDhvq/8S1/F7p7SHeUo7QyJ4vV+Dq\r
+H4/U+xyipWDC12vowH2b+xtzHOKuAhp0/Z4rXi8mRS2B7lz6DwDXvSQYAN/6vWSe\r
+3Zokc9TuRA90Je5oFjsOykXjWw2JJXujgGFwDoigwlTXSuNtrKYylUpTyj1aRG3W\r
+2ak6ntxWYk/X/HAxglgsB7PMvgdtKYCiR4RzyrCLAQ+H4VzUFym4Xc1i9pavGZQu\r
+FVWRXWRYVtGJnY1O1AjPxTcOZ23RAxqsjhBzv/AbvnSNdjSSlAWI0ZbXbA4xAQI=\r
+=UERK\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r