Re: emacs reply fills X clipboard with reply message body
authorJameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Thu, 8 May 2014 16:08:46 +0000 (09:08 +1700)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:02:23 +0000 (10:02 -0800)
25/9b6d4653e808f96d89c67911270aedcacbff6f [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/25/9b6d4653e808f96d89c67911270aedcacbff6f b/25/9b6d4653e808f96d89c67911270aedcacbff6f
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..5a7e41b
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFAFF431FBF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 May 2014 09:09:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id LrAmnK-6-uFe for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu,  8 May 2014 09:08:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D34C431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 May 2014 09:08:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F1D66E086D;\r
+       Thu,  8 May 2014 09:08:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-107-185-189-81.socal.res.rr.com\r
+       [107.185.189.81]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D80866E0886;\r
+       Thu,  8 May 2014 09:08:50 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 56F9560105; Thu,  8 May 2014 09:08:49 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: emacs reply fills X clipboard with reply message body\r
+In-Reply-To: <cunr444corw.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+References: <87vc1y6fbr.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <cunr444corw.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+198~gcd7c077 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 09:08:46 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87zjisxng1.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 16:09:06 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+\r
+On Thu, May 08 2014, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> [ I'm cycling around back through some old mail. ]\r
+>\r
+> On Tue, Sep 17 2013, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:\r
+>> I've just started noticing that when I reply to messages from the emacs\r
+>> UI, my X clipboard is filled with the body of the reply message,\r
+>> displacing whatever was in there previously.\r
+>\r
+> This doesn't happen to me today. Is it still a problem for other people?\r
+\r
+This was fixed a while back, although I don't remember which series it\r
+was that fixed it.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTa6wPAAoJEO00zqvie6q81DwQAKggt7V7AdFZ7zuCM+cKfXLX\r
+5g/HytMkVrqL4NrH4MhzuZ6VF70qaoKz8xZuWPb3GzgA9iGDUMp+rUH8otdHfgEA\r
+9AOr3a2wNahSkFncuC8ESWcsZVZQy2UZvzhHPvxmJSCuau64axuZwt0pesgv156i\r
+y7nNNYzRQ20AP6bHK1cWd7g0dsHU9Wr4zsozJaQMyACZYd9ZKBba6/ZT+6D8QaT0\r
+Xww4WZpAwPFbCaaGDx1A+udC4hdVw2t/E2gXagom4d/pI/wDDW/Ej6rKqyTpxEsE\r
+uMLCNeaKH/9cUuUAJn47CqQjkmujLwPtvmGJ2FE101uKaBvW/zKT6yuAf8T2orv7\r
+0HCzI+/wmReY6Wy0bDOwTHpHuQw8O5c2rv0DuDv0s4xD7ExGQV7ipt5+0l2T1hSM\r
+uWzCh5eUVhjIvmU06RxWld4txyJeVqG9wCCJf5wHTX6jKWlkLl0+/2QQTuxuY3D5\r
+KcBy0Hjh4xBkaAAm43zNLGGD2Mms3MMbU+8r3ZRa/E5aPd6ZLyN9mzkEXPOLTEVg\r
+mK+EKRdCQIdG0+HEO4AcF/TKNi8D3jiT6VBmiL9U2NUrkxa6MCRyIekD5InGQ8sN\r
+stvvUOSfEgXU/vTxEE6LtbkOmBspQ/GC7Th9tE+I4SnSpanEWn9u1j4juR/nwgFr\r
+UYSP//4DVA/qYHcLCdqb\r
+=QhDC\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r