--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1662B431FC7\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 May 2013 08:26:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+ NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id TZ0vCd2L3K+a for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Tue, 21 May 2013 08:26:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7764431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 May 2013 08:26:16 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+ by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1UeoS6-0000EQ-MD; Tue, 21 May 2013 16:26:15 +0100\r
+Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost)\r
+ by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1UeoS6-0006B4-EK; Tue, 21 May 2013 16:26:14 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make Emacs search use sexp format\r
+In-Reply-To: <1368851472-5382-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
+References: <1368851472-5382-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+255~gff3cc55 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 16:26:13 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87d2sk2w2y.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: a1f00f841d29b236a504cfc05f86d630 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -0.2\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: /\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+ determine if it is\r
+ spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+ This message scored -0.2 points.\r
+ Summary of the scoring: \r
+ * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+ provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+ * -0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 15:26:25 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+This whole series looks good to me (modulo the minor comments I have\r
+made). The tests all pass. Additionally it was very simple to modify\r
+notmuch-pick to use the new parser and that also seemed to work.\r
+\r
+Incidentally it seems that notmuch-show still uses the JSON format so we\r
+may want to switch that over too.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+\r
+On Sat, 18 May 2013, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote:\r
+> This series implements an incremental S-expression parser and switches\r
+> search over to it. To simplify things, it also implements better\r
+> handing of stderr for asynchronous processes so we don't have to\r
+> handle errors embedded in the S-expression stream.\r