Re: searching: '*analysis' vs 'reanalysis'

diff --git a/c0/b58f5c491fffac197d3e91aaf51255d5d74484 b/c0/b58f5c491fffac197d3e91aaf51255d5d74484
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..fcd7934
--- /dev/null
+++ b/c0/b58f5c491fffac197d3e91aaf51255d5d74484
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472446DE0281\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 05:42:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.012\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[AWL=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id Ag4AwSRglvs1 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Mon,  6 Jun 2016 05:42:36 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0019D6DE01C2\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 05:42:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1b9trH-0006vd-Fd; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 08:42:19 -0400\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 18294 invoked by uid 1000);\r
+ Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:42:28 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: searching: '*analysis' vs 'reanalysis'\r
+In-Reply-To: <1465196150-astroid-3-33kf2otxir-16915@strange>\r
+References: <1465196150-astroid-3-33kf2otxir-16915@strange>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22+28~gb9bf3f4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 09:42:28 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87lh2ijxor.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:42:44 -0000\r
+\r
+Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com> writes:\r
+\r
+> Hi,\r
+>\r
+> I have an email with the word 'reanalysis' in the subject line and the\r
+> email body. However, when I try to search for '*analysis' or 'analysis'\r
+> I do not get any matches, should not '*analysis' at least match?\r
+>\r
+\r
+We talked about this on IRC (the short answer is no), but is there some\r
+improvement you could suggest to the "Wildcards" section in\r
+notmuch-search-terms(7) ?\r
+\r
+d\r