--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <dtk@gmx.de>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B34431FD0\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:12:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.001\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id Aox500fh3oJZ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:12:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail.cryptobitch.de (cryptobitch.de [88.198.7.68])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E754431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:12:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail.jade-hamburg.de (unknown [85.183.11.228])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by mail.cryptobitch.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB01263A2;\r
+ Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:12:04 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: by mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix, from userid 33)\r
+ id DB8B9DF29F; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:12:03 +0200 (CEST)\r
+To: Ali Polatel <polatel@gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [python] set rpath in setup.cfg\r
+X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:func.inc\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:12:03 +0200\r
+From: dtk <dtk@gmx.de>\r
+In-Reply-To: <20111012153051.GE21615@hayalet>\r
+References: <6d84224ab757d84968df4db3a7b00fcb@jadE-Hamburg.de>\r
+ <20111012153051.GE21615@hayalet>\r
+Message-ID: <d8e00c1f9be7bf018677a2c868e95e6d@jadE-Hamburg.de>\r
+X-Sender: dtk@gmx.de\r
+User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.3.1\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
+Content-Type: text/plain;\r
+ charset=UTF-8\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:12:07 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+Hey alip,\r
+\r
+On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:30:51 +0300, Ali Polatel <polatel@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:55:30PM +0200, dtk wrote:\r
+>>/me dislikes LD_LIBRARY_PATH :/\r
+> \r
+> May I ask why you dislike LD_LIBRARY_PATH?\r
+ \r
+in my experience, it tends to cause awkward side effects that are hard to\r
+debug, the main problem being that it overrides all default paths and is\r
+hard to target at a single problematic application.\r
+\r
+google may tell you more[0].\r
+\r
+Yours\r
+dtk\r
+\r
+\r
+-----\r
+[0]here is what it told me:\r
+ * http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Admin/ld-lib-path.html\r
+ * http://blogs.oracle.com/ali/entry/avoiding_ld_library_path_the\r
+ * http://blogs.oracle.com/rie/date/20040710\r
+ * http://prefetch.net/articles/linkers.badldlibrary.html\r