Re: Bug#755544: notmuch-emacs: doesn't check gpg/pgp signatures by default
authorJameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:03:54 +0000 (18:03 +1700)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:03:49 +0000 (10:03 -0800)
80/230f5fc079f2590b75fdb11b759d818717d541 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/80/230f5fc079f2590b75fdb11b759d818717d541 b/80/230f5fc079f2590b75fdb11b759d818717d541
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2d77524
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C9E431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:04:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id ByzfhEDWh-Wc for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:04:00 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952DC431FC3\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:03:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AAAC66E05E7;\r
+       Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:03:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (unknown [198.129.209.152])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA9266E04A9;\r
+       Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:03:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id A4B63601B8; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:03:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>,\r
+       755544@bugs.debian.org\r
+Subject: Re: Bug#755544: notmuch-emacs: doesn't check gpg/pgp signatures\r
+       by      default\r
+In-Reply-To: <87silucnfx.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+References: <20140721223426.GA5250@siren>\r
+ <87silucnfx.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+198~gcd7c077 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:03:54 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87iomqxkzp.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:04:07 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+\r
+On Mon, Jul 21 2014, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> notmuch folks: it seems that in vagrant's message, and several others I\r
+> checked, it notmuch-crypto-process-mime==nil, then no signature button\r
+> is created at all.\r
+\r
+Yes, this is true.  The signature button is pretty meaningless if we're\r
+not processing the signature.\r
+\r
+Maybe instead by default we could have a signature button that opens up\r
+a notmuch-crypto-process-mime customization buffer?\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTzbh6AAoJEO00zqvie6q8PjUP/2dhIJl3q4oMSBFWZePurNCd\r
+bGG7n5rcJVamGKEYgcBbqEvMSOcLEO+NUvJ1dx5Zvbyrz3CFb850c51XiKgG7GTZ\r
+xcyumUe4QkCFptdJdfHba7vPuLDAivmCXg94JL8noWsWHukf2vn7AUbZZzBrJjm4\r
+u/T+k9EvdEphEHGjMcAhLwW0Ds29Tm+0MCTJ00CPegJ3T40qCctgldjfFbGi6Cl/\r
+3r1lA4dngeTtH0ZBBChZGadS759cTaYoDGN0F5iVNAjgS5mxWpxMvGn/XgL2Mmwz\r
+QXqU5zP2JxeKvIhjVwksoBuCcuc/iuiXz9wXV37TD3g74LYwaEQzalpoog7TI4VJ\r
+MZPDz16oA+EDWzhhdp2Fhv0K1V1+5atvJHipkcxQQndVle8AHHyohRL7IPYVtOXJ\r
+/++6/0O+ewNfU+VUmvjaJE0clcdhinFUW9n9SUw8cwzsofxSVPYj9NAQ4TRuk/O2\r
++dZSmQv3HCDalGRgbMWxKEcdRKB+knEaDwhgIT2d72VYxj6CO+7r+3BmsHkvGd/V\r
+GxnAvecw6NHJUU0TxcGHJ6jiOWRzBxqvh2vtxMvwROciebGMO70vHYCqFlBitGm6\r
+IGhFCXZhH/pdgUsfrRmxsITd3AZaxhuxR0GL6yOArHXl129aOv5JVSNJxap7Rhuk\r
+CTzWGuBNHO1YRM2a6tQE\r
+=xN7E\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r