Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] cli: slightly refactor "notmuch reply" address scanning functions

diff --git a/0b/29daab43a38ad8c11a9d485c9d3b45e1b323f0 b/0b/29daab43a38ad8c11a9d485c9d3b45e1b323f0
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..16542dc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/0b/29daab43a38ad8c11a9d485c9d3b45e1b323f0
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+Return-Path: <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403DF431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:11 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id qIssMC8Bo9hJ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:11 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE4A3431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:10 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2so4923084bka.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:09 -0800 (PST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
+       h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id\r
+       :mime-version:content-type;\r
+       bh=KsE0wo0GVateuB2/NEQMDcNN5LubiT1SSXy4tM+Pe2M=;\r
+       b=KQCEmqlnkFwdObDXHMRKDxiKflxVGbUJVtgA6zPISIYHS4NAQjAWrfZWiW22+W7mjI\r
+       U+uYeHTuK7TOsHly5c4+SkNITtteXM/sCqPXVfH9HpQ6rRo/PLWXtv1Donn0axHrpxaB\r
+       F/cv7KvVaBiGIM2Egpcg1ivom8D9IQUxPZjw0=\r
+Received: by 10.204.152.219 with SMTP id h27mr5254508bkw.75.1326737229467;\r
+       Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:09 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost ([91.144.186.21])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ig13sm8946539bkc.9.2012.01.16.10.07.08\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:08 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>,\r
+       notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] cli: slightly refactor "notmuch reply" address\r
+       scanning functions\r
+In-Reply-To: <871ur2jo6z.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <cover.1326551350.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+       <f994789d065d898911bbf127a7453137a9ba8e27.1326551350.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+       <871ur2jo6z.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+68~gab6495e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:06:15 +0400\r
+Message-ID: <878vl78qug.fsf@gmail.com>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:07:11 -0000\r
+\r
+Hello.\r
+\r
+Since this patches got in, I have yet to send a single email to the\r
+address(es) I intend to :( I am really used to the bindings and this\r
+change is a pain.  From IRC discussion, it seems like I am not alone\r
+here.\r
+\r
+There was a proposal to change reply bindings to 'ra' and 'rs'.  When\r
+'r' is pressed an appropriate help message can be given in the\r
+minibuffer.  I like this proposal.  What do others think?\r
+\r
+If others like it, how about reverting to the old bindings until the new\r
+ones are implemented?\r
+\r
+Regards,\r
+  Dmitry\r