Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging operations

diff --git a/fb/6a570c247c5cd6475238d5bcf2e18111c486a2 b/fb/6a570c247c5cd6475238d5bcf2e18111c486a2
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..0d2ed9c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fb/6a570c247c5cd6475238d5bcf2e18111c486a2
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0CB9431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:50:54 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id ujrPJa8TiSuD for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:50:53 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru-group.fi [87.108.86.66])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4346431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:50:53 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix, from userid 501)\r
+       id 8FFEE68055; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:50:53 +0200 (EET)\r
+From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>,\r
+       Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging\r
+       operations\r
+In-Reply-To: <87haye6g1c.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <1327725684-5887-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>\r
+       <1328426033-21480-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>\r
+       <87wr7xqpuf.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca> <878vjtqhcg.fsf@praet.org>\r
+       <87haye6g1c.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+239~g4d2d96b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
+       $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
+       !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
+Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:50:53 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <m2wr781gaa.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:50:55 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:20:31 -0400, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:\r
+> > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> > > On Sun,  5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> > \r
+> > How about if '*' applies to all messages (as it currently does),\r
+> > but 'C-u *' only to open messages?  That would make more sense IMHO.\r
+> > \r
+> > But, conforming to your original request, I've implemented the inverse.\r
+> > \r
+> \r
+> Thanks for implementing that. I could live with either way. Do other\r
+> people have opinions on this? My reasoning is if you descend into a\r
+> thread from some search page, it seems likely that you want to operate\r
+> on the messages matching the search.\r
+\r
+I've pretty soon lost the original open/close status as I often navigate\r
+through messages by opening/closing messages, so for me not operating\r
+on all messages in thread is magic behaviour. In case I'd use C-u *\r
+I first have to check through the full thread what are the actual\r
+messages currently open (lots of screen scrolling :( )\r
+\r
+So, I prefer '*' operating on all messages in a thread and C-u '*'\r
+for all open messages in a thread.\r
+\r
+> \r
+> d\r
+\r
+Tomi\r