Re: [PATCH] Restore original keybinding ('r' = reply-to-all)

diff --git a/f2/6651e6e62552855cd51530532d741def431d89 b/f2/6651e6e62552855cd51530532d741def431d89
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..0153026
--- /dev/null
+++ b/f2/6651e6e62552855cd51530532d741def431d89
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A57B431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
+       autolearn=unavailable\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id Na52EeofCEAe for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D9A431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A2D2E508EC;\r
+       Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (m17.ligo.caltech.edu [131.215.115.117])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F042E50B75;\r
+       Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id C2C3EAE6; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>, Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>,\r
+       David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,\r
+       Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restore original keybinding ('r' = reply-to-all)\r
+In-Reply-To: <87hatv4e37.fsf@poker.hands.com>\r
+References: <1340815565-21083-1-git-send-email-cworth@cworth.org>\r
+       <87obo4zljq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87hatwqoz9.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <87ehozmpcq.fsf@jhu.edu>\r
+       <87hatv4e37.fsf@poker.hands.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+54~ga0426dc (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:11 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87fw9fwgp4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:21:22 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Thu, Jun 28 2012, Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> wrote:\r
+> Actually, instead of either of these options, how about some way of\r
+> letting r do the single reply, and then once inside the reply, having\r
+> some key binding to add the rest of the recipients in the group, or flip\r
+> between the two options so one can change one's mind after typing up the\r
+> reply?\r
+\r
+This is a good idea.  The other idea I had was to have 'r' query the\r
+user directly about whether or not they want to reply all before\r
+constructing the reply template.  Or right before you're about to send.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP7IR3AAoJEO00zqvie6q814AP/i+Xxb0KBO3ciQcdfcuOk5eh\r
++Z60q0VJfE2COB49pHxuWWa8cB3BDo6Ymjpjnd1HNdDeZB4+G0AI5/yA1EEAfAVJ\r
+099zRvF0yEqoVFWFPutp8V1tLhQeUEFjDsvkqfJnu+d8nHUuAyzwtMU6LRTtdLlj\r
+o0v9LJG2u10ihtOsFXbVHj4ZmetOrkH5g24NLVjSdYKZtCB7MpfcgQ1MGjfgAFqW\r
+mOHTpi2ADEYp5cBST42NYaOW82X+yKyLQFC8rp05tNNRvFu/868XggArI+UiclI0\r
+GUSpr2dfXXU1Iq2PiJ5sNgLNpNVqZ48HGJoyLqv9VCL28AZdqWn/z+wFkNSU7cjr\r
+fybLc4psPTibWfCUVNL84ErazubWiLX1xXnH/RFUy6Oqtnyia1QAnIvJZzlEoxOk\r
+KYLohPAQsRdzN0hCVgFS6GF5/JUE600NeQAR86mbGfbN7C8YiLnxbEsNNEqkVKyh\r
+8bjjyLi868wXyiOV7p7KilUc6/TTunvcQK21w80M8u1bc9+gQZXXd7lQ5KY9PhXv\r
+UXgMaEMmSnavWzTntiIDSLhNo7wd773jTRc+uC2JzEddfk62MmG3Td8f1dQiQOC/\r
+x5nmYlYmBznaHpboTJ2WmnlvmvFqlI/vqU2j2UvFT41PszhbaeFFKs4QQnXg5iRu\r
+eZuy13FGFq4YyMywWilw\r
+=LQjL\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r