--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <matt@bubblegen.co.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE5C431E82\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:00:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 2.438\r
+X-Spam-Level: **\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id mOm4XCTHOUns for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:00:26 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from sip.bubblegen.co.uk (bubblegen.plus.com [80.229.236.194])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5627A431E62\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:00:26 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Message-ID: <5511DE10.80107@bubblegen.co.uk>\r
+Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:58:40 +0000\r
+From: Matthew Lear <matt@bubblegen.co.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: emacs / vim - time taken to open threads\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:00:29 -0000\r
+\r
+Hi all,\r
+Continuing my journey with notmuch... It has been very enjoyable so far.\r
+One thing which has been puzzling me greatly is the time it can take to\r
+notmuch-show a moderately sized thread (eg one with 32 messages with a\r
+three to four sentence paragraph per message - approx 32 x 35kB with\r
+some small attachments). Opening the thread using notmuch-show in emacs\r
+takes about six seconds. If I build the ruby bindings and load up\r
+notmuch in vim or gvim, opening the same thread takes less than a\r
+second. It's *loads* quicker.\r
+\r
+I've rolled back and rolled forwards the version of emacs in my gentoo\r
+installation (various versions of 24) and built it without all available\r
+options, run it bare bones in X and without X. The behaviour is the\r
+same. I've also stripped back my .emacs to nothing more than pulling in\r
+notmuch.el but there is no change in the behaviour.\r
+\r
+I've read some posts about emacs hanging when opening emails due to\r
+attached files, but that was quite a while ago (pre 24). Some of the\r
+emails in my thread have photos (a few hundred kB), others have URLs but\r
+this shouldn't slow emacs down.\r
+\r
+Despite being a vi guy for years, I prefer the emacs interface to\r
+notmuch and really like what it provides. I'm sticking with it but there\r
+is clearly a problem and I'd like to solve it. It's annoying when you\r
+know that something isn't working as well as it should be.\r
+\r
+Is it known that emacs is slower with notmuch or do you think I have\r
+some kind of build / environment problem? Or could it be due to some of\r
+the email content (doubtful) or something else such as encoding etc?\r
+\r
+Cheers,\r
+-- Matt\r