Re: [PATCH 6/7] cli: add --quiet option to notmuch new

diff --git a/ac/a2f5f6261eeadd3b5c988a6f440a7748f7ed42 b/ac/a2f5f6261eeadd3b5c988a6f440a7748f7ed42
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2a1ea36
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ac/a2f5f6261eeadd3b5c988a6f440a7748f7ed42
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E492F431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 01:54:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id QTsHUC1Ekvr9 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri, 24 Jan 2014 01:54:31 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-bk0-f45.google.com (mail-bk0-f45.google.com\r
+       [209.85.214.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC3DD431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 01:54:30 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by mail-bk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id v16so1021845bkz.4\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 01:54:29 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
+       h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references\r
+       :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
+       bh=xdVuC1aN/hzZsA1m3ePI5bg7lGO3c4JDi98xrmalqtM=;\r
+       b=fpbvJbZ/r6MlP8y/LD1kM8jCBJXioETL8PnSUXyk0axmtcikMWnhF2I/DNhBKCEVgE\r
+       B6wbk9yEiOsZ04BKyd2DVXv2/15s4CngxBQHwYboxDWC8s+Pxu2pnodhr12ZmFZzG5s6\r
+       oGr3+u6zLcaVWaqodlq/Nlc7o5HmzLGMlVj3rPiApBNyzmmB6w8mygFSI4jFU5oXN/cL\r
+       nKr/6TB8j5NxSgb2uyPGjtXe7wkRDuV3k81jA3v2muiRqT6UA9KCbF1MorfVzmejXpur\r
+       FeOHmVLsaKWTHiWNTtJaNppOOKVvRj4+FSXLUw3yho2jzQEXAggHtbdF3UH24sDqJckw\r
+       y/bQ==\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQk2feOzt/uSRTvMNDT+11YnltMDkrTqjNx1MhuHVDu5b3yz40AjYeqpt/nWSabdDkwoC1WW\r
+X-Received: by 10.204.116.70 with SMTP id l6mr298262bkq.130.1390557268091;\r
+       Fri, 24 Jan 2014 01:54:28 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost ([2001:4b98:dc0:43:216:3eff:fe1b:25f3])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d5sm2219017bkc.9.2014.01.24.01.54.26\r
+       for <multiple recipients>\r
+       (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);\r
+       Fri, 24 Jan 2014 01:54:27 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] cli: add --quiet option to notmuch new\r
+In-Reply-To: <87txctah9h.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+References: <cover.1390163335.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+       <276371280dfbf8d98a9970b68910e1c030769641.1390163335.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+       <87txctah9h.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17~rc2+18~gab1d8e8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:54:15 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87iot91z94.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:54:36 -0000\r
+\r
+On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> I am not sure I like doing the database upgrade with no comment to the\r
+> user at all.\r
+\r
+I think --quiet should mean we don't write to stdout at all. So the\r
+question becomes, is the database upgrade worth warning about in stderr?\r
+\r
+> In fact I am not sure I like doing the upgrade without being\r
+> specifically told to (e.g. it does not give the user a clear chance to\r
+> backup the database first)\r
+>\r
+> What would people think about having a --upgrade-database option to\r
+> notmuch new? \r
+\r
+We discussed this at length on IRC some time ago. I think we concluded\r
+we should continue doing it automatically, but I'll post a summary when\r
+I have the time.\r
+\r
+BR,\r
+Jani.\r