--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DD4431FC7\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 13:03:39 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id igrdyCf3XApK for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Wed, 31 Dec 2014 13:03:36 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B804A431FC0\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 13:03:36 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1Y6QQY-0000mZ-Ll; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 17:03:34 -0400\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 8276 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 31 Dec 2014\r
+ 21:03:29 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] cli: address: Add --filter-by option to\r
+ configure address filtering\r
+In-Reply-To: <1415147159-19946-11-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+References: <1415147159-19946-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+ <1415147159-19946-11-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+7~g5d7f7a6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 22:03:29 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87vbkrfs66.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Cc: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 21:03:40 -0000\r
+\r
+Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> writes:\r
+\r
+> This option allows to configure the criterion for duplicate address\r
+> filtering. Without this option, all unique combinations of name and\r
+> address parts are printed. This option allows to filter the output\r
+> more, for example to only contain unique address parts.\r
+\r
+I had the feeling there was some "controversy" about the UI here, but\r
+following back the 3 versions of the series I didn't see it. Does that\r
+mean we just need to sanity check the code, or are there outstanding\r
+bikes to shed?\r
+\r
+d\r