Changed guessed Q from 5 to 1, which gives about the right breadth.
authorW. Trevor King <wking@drexel.edu>
Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:26:51 +0000 (16:26 -0500)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@drexel.edu>
Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:26:51 +0000 (16:26 -0500)
commitcff059a07858c58e461b3e7dcc865d302e9fd04c
tree282bb5b9e77342158645a78cf4c8e579561816b3
parent3210170167e375d3e12b8c0fada0df8f04e37498
Changed guessed Q from 5 to 1, which gives about the right breadth.

I'm dubious about the fit quality though.  Looking at the fit.log
output after looking at the 20080919_cantA_tweak.vib data again reveals
  After 4 iterations the fit converged.
  final sum of squares of residuals : 9.6001e+08
  rel. change during last iteration : -2.46003e-07
for the first curve, and similar residuals (and exactly 4 iterations)
for the other curves.  Hmm.  I should probably explicitly show the range
of frequency space I'm fitting in.
calibcant/vib_analyze.py