sawsim/discussion.tex: Rework Bell testing to match scaffold phrasing
authorW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Tue, 21 May 2013 20:41:39 +0000 (16:41 -0400)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Tue, 21 May 2013 20:41:39 +0000 (16:41 -0400)
commitce839c063b0fd57a0f3dc50a32e960333d42d50d
tree73dd51bf41a4fa2205348376ae16f5b2fcb5b4e9
parentfdad75deaed6307685c3468917e085229c7e8df6
sawsim/discussion.tex: Rework Bell testing to match scaffold phrasing

This fills in the derivation of the Gumbel pdf from the exponential
hazard function.  In the scaffold section, we rephrased the hazard
function and then cited NIST:gumbel to make the transition to the pdf.
Maybe this derivation would be better of in an appendix?  Or dropped
entirely?  I'll leave it for now.
src/apparatus/cantilever-calib.tex
src/sawsim/discussion.tex
src/sawsim/methods.tex