projects / git.git / commit
? search:
summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree
(parent: fcd1e31) | patch
Why didn't we mark want_obj as ~UNINTERESTING in the old code?
authorJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 06:47:45 +0000 (22:47 -0800)
committerJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:42:49 +0000 (15:42 -0800)
commitc6702f4b95699c6bd47337516c32e3408dda0595
tree3b33845a74d430c95823bc3e44fe7e49d3012bbetree | snapshot
parentfcd1e3190612fc59c2d820537280b5164d290d9dcommit | diff
Why didn't we mark want_obj as ~UNINTERESTING in the old code?

Is this something we would want to do regardless of shallow clone?
upload-pack.c diff | blob | history
Git—the stupid content tracker