Upgraded BE repository to v1.4.

[calibcant.git] / .be / d02d4a7b-aabf-48f4-a340-0a474df543d6 / bugs / 327f4db8-3119-4ec1-a762-a3115254608a / comments / d6ee4411-37cb-4978-b025-919b63db533d / body

diff --git a/.be/d02d4a7b-aabf-48f4-a340-0a474df543d6/bugs/327f4db8-3119-4ec1-a762-a3115254608a/comments/d6ee4411-37cb-4978-b025-919b63db533d/body b/.be/d02d4a7b-aabf-48f4-a340-0a474df543d6/bugs/327f4db8-3119-4ec1-a762-a3115254608a/comments/d6ee4411-37cb-4978-b025-919b63db533d/body
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..46c0763
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.be/d02d4a7b-aabf-48f4-a340-0a474df543d6/bugs/327f4db8-3119-4ec1-a762-a3115254608a/comments/d6ee4411-37cb-4978-b025-919b63db533d/body
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+And here is my analysis of data on the same cantilever that I took:
+
+Variable (units)              : mean +/- std. dev. (relative error)
+Cantilever k (N/m)            : 0.0686691 +/- 0.00134223 (0.0195464)
+photoSensitivity**2 (V/nm)**2 : 0.000333038 +/- 1.88694e-06 (0.00566586)
+T (K)                         : 295.15 +/- 5.68434e-14 (1.92592e-16)
+1/Vphoto**2 (1/V)**2          : 50598.9 +/- 946.564 (0.0187072)
+