-The “master” branch has the current state-of-the-art source (Markdown,
-ReST, LaTeX, …) for the instructors' projected content (HTML pages,
-PDF slides, …), handouts, workshop homepage, …. If we can't agree on
-a canonical representation, there may be a handful of feature branches
-with alternative content.
+The “master” branch has the current state-of-the-art source for the
+instructors' projected content (HTML pages, PDF slides, …), handouts,
+workshop homepage, …. If we can't agree on a canonical
+representation, there may be a handful of feature branches with
+alternative content.
+
+Topics will live in per-subject subdirectories, ideally organized in
+half-day-sized chunks.
+
+ .
+ ├── README.md
+ ├── debugging
+ │ ├── README.ipynb
+ │ …
+ ├── make
+ │ ├── README.md
+ │ ├── example-project
+ │ …
+ ├── python
+ │ ├── README.rst
+ │ ├── animals.txt
+ │ …
+ ├── shell
+ │ …
+ ├── version-control
+ │ ├── git
+ │ │ ├── basic
+ │ │ │ …
+ │ │ └── advanced
+ … … …
+
+ Figure 1: Example directory tree for the current 2012-12-my-workshop
+ tip. Sections should be in half-day-ish chunks. Complicated topics
+ that need more detailed coverage (e.g. version control) can have
+ nested sub-sections.