Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AEE4196F2 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:16:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id icgTdNzfGHsv; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:16:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBB3431FC1; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:16:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F1597568DE4; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:16:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: David Edmondson , notmuch Subject: Re: pull request In-Reply-To: <87fx2p0yjt.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> References: <87sk722sfq.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> <87eiibq22s.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> <87ljcj2u4z.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <8739yq8zix.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> <877ho2w0ov.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87fx2p0yjt.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:15:48 -0700 Message-ID: <87vdbkfwgr.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:16:02 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:39:50 +0100, David Edmondson wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:25:36 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > > I'm currently working on the make-emacs-use-JSON patch, (it's got some > > confusion about "body visible" vs. "message visible" that I want to > > fix before pushing). >=20 > Could you describe the confusion? Sure. Hiding a message with 'b' is visually identical to hiding it with RET. Except that the internal mechanism is distinct, so that afterwards one can't make it visible again with RET. I think we just need to drop 'b'---it's really not needed as a separate keybinding now that RET works on any part of a message. And after that, there's some simplification to be made in the code.[*] I'll have some patches pushed for this soon, (on top of the switch to JSON for the emacs code). =2DCarl [*] Even more simplification is possible if we stop trying to hide header components. Several people have requested that To and Cc be visible all the time. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLz07k6JDdNq8qSWgRApdMAJ94aKoKDz3o4+PEr/kozr30JtFNUwCfSl5R qu7H1RnWyYo1f3ljHJqOybg= =HGVo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--