Message-ID: <50B5BDFF.1080802@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:32:15 +0100
From: Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Subject: Re: gmail label support patch available for oflineimap
References: <k8vn08$62g$2@ger.gmane.org> <87zk24ctko.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>
	<50B3871B.2050509@gmail.com> <87r4ngcl00.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>
	<50B48627.9040409@gmail.com> <xa1tfw3vugkf.fsf@mina86.com>
	<CAGhLh6Fhxq=bFHVPfVaMg0dXLgF3VEr-nBh62CbBAW7arwsM9Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<xa1t8v9mvogd.fsf@mina86.com>
	<CAGhLh6HKLwFbyfp8AfYLJuhhCxQUCpZ4F8nfJ6q1WmBZVOZSuQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<xa1t38zuvmqb.fsf@mina86.com>
In-Reply-To: <xa1t38zuvmqb.fsf@mina86.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Rainer@krugs.de

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 27/11/12 21:01, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27 2012, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>> I saw on the offlineimap mailing list, that somebody is using this approach (x-header) to
>> sync the gmail labels and to use them in his email client - so I thought, why not read them
>> as tags into notmuch and sync tgs back, so one would have a sync between notmuch tags and
>> gmail labels. But there was some objections and it was questioned why offlineimap for this,
>> and not notmuch - and frankly, I don't hava any preferences. If it is i[plemented in
>> offlineimap and notmuch uses it, fine with me. If offlineimap stays as it is and notmuch
>> reads the labels directly, absolutely no problem. I am merely intersted in the outcome - sync
>> of notmuch tags with gmail labels - whatever the path is.
> 
> Ah, OK.
> 
> I just want to say that having notmuch communicate with Gmail is terrible idea, since this
> would mean duplicating of jobs that offlineimap and notmuch do.

My sentiments, notmuch is doing realy good what it is doing, and adding gmail / other server
communication is not the best idea.

> 
> I could see some *other* tool, besides notmuch and offlineimap, which connects to Gmail to
> fetch the tags, but that would again duplicate a lot of the code from offlineimap.

I also agree here - offlineimap already has a repository type Gmail, and if gmails imap
extensions, particularly
https://developers.google.com/google-apps/gmail/imap_extensions#access_to_gmail_labels_x-gm-labels
is used, it should be not to difficult to read the labels and to store them in e.g. a sqlite
database for each message id. This could then be written back as well, and only the [GMAIL] folder
would have to be synchronised, i.e. no duplication.

> 
> I think that communicating with the server should be left to offlineimap (or whatever other
> method one uses), and indexing should be left to notmuch.

agree here as well. Will approach the offlineimap comuity about this again.

Cheers,

Rainer


> 
> 
> 


- -- 
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys.
(Germany)

Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
Stellenbosch University
South Africa

Tel :       +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44
Cell:       +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98
Fax :       +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44

Fax (D):    +49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44

email:      Rainer@krugs.de

Skype:      RMkrug
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlC1vf4ACgkQoYgNqgF2egpYwACeOAMKZHIZURAOmbUqN6D86BQy
zCUAn2NfekMjnJ1KCqdRjgs01BQlxn44
=VynC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----