Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B4B431FAF for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:33:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RA4PWzUhqkfq for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:33:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20ACF431FAE for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:33:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id b23so10003294vbz.26 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:33:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xiUVpUMiflQhjb5NbD0w4MDDfKBUDUBhGDz6nq2Phgk=; b=DfZrRZHGSjLYx+pjj0/NIPFEOD43PKkobMBR+iaVjaWrAqtLejikVSWT03j4f1Ius6 Tu1L2CAPCJ29A+pe9NvO/kixFO0P8zbaedVCuxjgQvaNw6L4mo44zmt7+trifwbRRCUz Fl4Gt8fa5hqvQUF23uPiRu/aG6w1viH5/8/v26wsZM5wahMmuH2cavasyL84mNYJFePg kpNEUjo45NV+VbTKdZWwtUW99qaocicdlICm41amT5HirA1U4hWjJ/GlW/3/G5aa9s5f HH0fBjJG/4RlH2GAf0B5qZRGKjkp3ke2pyUmvm++03m3z+6Hs9Pxmw0m3Lbgxek6mHJR b/RA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.220.18 with SMTP id hw18mr29970286vcb.59.1354145589334; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:33:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.34.51 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:33:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <87zk24ctko.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> <50B3871B.2050509@gmail.com> <87r4ngcl00.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> <50B48627.9040409@gmail.com> <50B5BDFF.1080802@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:33:09 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: gmail label support patch available for oflineimap From: Felipe Contreras To: Jani Nikula Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Notmuch Mail , Rainer@krugs.de X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:33:11 -0000 On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Nov 28, 2012 12:10 PM, "Felipe Contreras" > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote: >> >> >> I just want to say that having notmuch communicate with Gmail is >> >> terrible idea, since this >> >> would mean duplicating of jobs that offlineimap and notmuch do. >> > >> > My sentiments, notmuch is doing realy good what it is doing, and adding >> > gmail / other server >> > communication is not the best idea. >> >> And I disagree. > > Which part do you disagree with, before or after "and", or both? Care to > elaborate, in either case? Any concrete suggestions? After the "and" of course :) I think it would be trivial to add Gmail-style folders to notmuch. Maybe a configuration that maps directories with tags. This in fact wouldn't even be Gmail specific, and would help the people coming from procmail, and other ways of organizing mail. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras