Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B2C429E25 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:36:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SfKX-dDIicH6 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kaylee.flamingspork.com (kaylee.flamingspork.com [74.207.245.61]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9748431FB6 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from willster (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kaylee.flamingspork.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D68A9609E; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:35:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by willster (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BB4AC30BC092; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:36:41 +1000 (EST) From: Stewart Smith To: Carl Worth , notmuch Subject: Re: [BUG] [PATCH] Fix appending of Received headers In-Reply-To: <877h8tqkrp.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <878vu6ulev.fsf@flamingspork.com> <87ipszltyi.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <877h8tqkrp.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-215-g5143e5e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:36:41 +1000 Message-ID: <87fwnhw0ue.fsf@flamingspork.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:36:39 -0000 On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:22:50 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: Non-text part: multipart/signed > On Tue, 24 May 2011 13:33:25 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > > On Tue, 17 May 2011 12:10:32 +1000, Stewart Smith wrote: > > > We're not properly concatenating the Received headers if we parse them > > > while requesting a header that isn't Received. > ... > > I'd prefer to fix the test suite here so that we don't later regress on > > this behavior. > > I've done that now. What the test suite was missing was having messages > that actually had more than one Received header, (otherwise, no > concatenation was ever used in the testing). > > The new test and the patch are both now pushed. Great and thanks! Sorry I didn't manage to get updating test suite to the top of my TODO list. -- Stewart Smith