DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:subject:to:in-reply-to:references;
	b=EXmzlUT59xh6utqj8dD0JqsU1VTaY0DTtKOOT6lQ6NlvZ0IgffzJHunFcFM5tS5T4g
	sGz2D76BBUgxHraCc2pS27ICMf4g/zI/VH/dENUSTWAL98dn0KAA6bLsbMlGllsf+oxa
	81m0cqLdkrljwlQyrfk7aX5Gyfk68DgpxAduw=
Message-ID: <4b997185.07a5660a.68e5.3260@mx.google.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:41:09 -0800 (PST)
From: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org,
	cworth@cworth.org
In-Reply-To: <878wa8sdbq.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
References: <1264272821-sup-5331@ben-laptop>
	<1264368215-7101-1-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
	<1264368215-7101-2-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
	<1264368215-7101-3-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
	<878wa8sdbq.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 2/2] Build and link against notmuch shared
	library
Precedence: list

On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:25:45 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote:
> I just tried out this patch to compile notmuch as a shared library and
> while producing lib/libnotmuch.so.1 it fails to find notmuch later:

Try the version I just posted. It will apply against master and builds on my machine.

> Is more needed than this patch? Also, *I* think it would be nice to
> support --static or --shared as options to --configure. But that is a
> minor thing, probably.

What do others think about this? Would it be useful, counter-productive, or
none of the above to allow configuration of the library type?

Cheers,

- Ben