Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657F7431FC4 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:46:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZkRZArj35Ct9 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:46:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com (mail-qa0-f48.google.com [209.85.216.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EBA6431FAF for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:46:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id v10so8648580qac.21 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:46:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=A/zw5n3vMoZnapi8hlyv4MGR+qU2RaT6ivCEzu3LO30=; b=jXCH5Qgcjy+Gp+f5hvJ5Ar+6rwF8bCgihjAMWgU1TtGvyA7c5hs6GY0UlF59PRR785 otvLajJ6AmrmPinTihHXH7isws0jiJ47TCSaLWDQyIX0gKEjKq1zgqPzIG5v3yAQd28R b44A3GI67AhQBq4tOhBg0w41O11PwaTs0qUKapwnQG4MOyZqc/YFPKsBL9Kx4JBF5dVs CH3o9ROfS32/DeeStK3qUwbtye6xqIdiIIhteCAqKz+kODhy3tit8GkyoJy3LPQ//aDD C4iw7eoC//VCV020M41xDdTdnXlT2FWV70dmXSATiCcxvMEalbl08i0oxsejKKx7ctmq Y/OQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.85.104 with SMTP id m95mr55358337qgd.93.1418676400496; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:46:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.77.105 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:46:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87iohc7iiz.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> References: <87k4q7s43v.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> <878w6gis5g.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <871v70ril7.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <871v70z0y5.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87iohc7iiz.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:46:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Python bindings and Xapian exceptions From: Matt To: David Bremner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:13:44 -0800 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 20:46:44 -0000 2014-12-15 21:41 GMT+01:00 David Bremner : > Matt writes: > >>> > But for exceptions in general, yes the notmuch library does need to be >>> > fixed to allow the caller of functions to distinguish between things >>> > like "no matches found" and "an exception occurred, so it's unknown if >>> > any messages match the search". That's a general class of library >>> > interface bugs that all need to be fixed. >> >> I 've also hit this *API bug* and was wondering if a fix had been done since >> then (I use notmuch 0.17) ? I found nothing on http://notmuchmail.org/news/ > > Can you be more specific? I'd say in general no thorough overhaul of > error handling has happened, but if you can tell us what particular > libnotmuch function (or the equivalient python binding) you are having > trouble with, we may be able to give a more informative answer. > For instance when using the python bindings: In constructor I do self.db = notmuch.Database(self.db_path) and there I have a method called periodically that returns: returns notmuch.Query(self.db, "tag:unread and tag:inbox").count_messages() When it fails the previous method returns 0 and displays on stdout/stderr; "A Xapian exception occurred: The revision being read has been discarded - you should call Xapian::Database::reopen() and retry the operation Query string was: tag:unread and tag:inbox" The way for me to detect an error is to redirect stdout and check if the method outputted to stdout, which is not practical. I wish it would either return "-1", throw an exception or return 2 numbers like "errorcode, returned value". I personnally don't care if it's done at the library level or in the python bindings. Regards