Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA166DE1668 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 10:26:08 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.552 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.168, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gZPFTONzwdo7 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 10:26:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com (mail-wm0-f67.google.com [74.125.82.67]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55EE46DE01F5 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 10:26:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-f67.google.com with SMTP id l68so12253361wml.3 for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 10:26:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nikula-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=S5nM7i7ec1HhCcduz56jlHevthrwYmQp+5r3ahf8uuk=; b=qZgXH5CpJGznYKbTqqT8JLWSu7cU9Yf7SZw6LqhpjVMeqD4+/R/lvaHzV3XItEvU5n GSi8uYojU6guJ75ZuQ3mfhU97sy+tYsDW4o7A6/xwVjpt4PiOcZatrEMeZ1THFUulKb8 CpivchWnnjrXvVTnJEXACKiPgUnqBAoQIDRHQOqhS3okTJFioMM+PO/TuGLiVRkccZuz kpx2STq9HQOOWpRKCCwc8siqO1CHu+ecupJzihO5UaIobhcnGR5jGoB99nZY3HZyyIS9 XSDt5/JRLVMCjic+Z3Pv/kJN0WBECEj21YyQXjUIKCj9CeaI9JkcIkcjOOWBqkm90Ns3 t8XA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=S5nM7i7ec1HhCcduz56jlHevthrwYmQp+5r3ahf8uuk=; b=eCJdQHB+VkEnx5IBvQ2gkfDTZLozc1+mzdlsL4Yc5N32w3qW1Vm8woCpwN2Qzzdpo4 bcTox8xVEkZk1zOJtP0HTdub+7Ak/I4Y+3Yd+uGWneqOXK5aZTtH5Dk2e2fEcyrcwS2l yjlLy7oj6lNyjfQsLmYlD17/Sgvu528G+2kZQmjJXV/Hsw5psgQ83ZuZ5EAaUbGJQG4U maC4t9xOH3fA5E7ldr5s5xQuexdUADvrIhB+6vkE5blllr0abJxqWHayuD95buceZHS9 nUB029yOCVXn1hh6wE9J987G3RVymWmBZ3c0iYNALdKCZtJ5BCZMJR/Rb/TKrkz57Nrk 5+zQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJ6gNtISI33Qg+TM0qzqkEbL9jVVJBgKNxKLlN2mPFQrCdsAFGEq4gaPCCauS29zA== X-Received: by 10.194.63.144 with SMTP id g16mr28833399wjs.149.1457375164893; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 10:26:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (mobile-access-bcee39-255.dhcp.inet.fi. [188.238.57.255]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id hm9sm19214223wjb.34.2016.03.07.10.26.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 Mar 2016 10:26:04 -0800 (PST) From: Jani Nikula To: David Edmondson , Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] emacs/mua: Generate improved cited text for replies In-Reply-To: References: <1455992680-24978-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> <1455992680-24978-5-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> <87vb4y5g6s.fsf@nikula.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+73~gf8cc320 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 20:25:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87mvqa5eo1.fsf@nikula.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 18:26:08 -0000 On Mon, 07 Mar 2016, David Edmondson wrote: > [ text/plain ] > On Mon, Mar 07 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: >> For a message with mime structure: >> >> =E2=94=94=E2=94=AC=E2=95=B4multipart/mixed 120338 bytes >> =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=95=B4text/html 59234 bytes >> =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=95=B4application/octet-stream attachment [filenam= e.html] 59234 bytes > > How is this displayed when viewing the message (as opposed to replying)? Both parts are displayed roughly similarly as html, with the error message in between. The latter part has some images the former part doesn't have. > How do you think that it is intended to be displayed? Are they two > sub-parts of the multipart/mixed intended to be alternatives? (It > doesn't seem so, as you mention later that they have the same content.) I think they're intended to be alternatives, but there's really no way to deduce that. IMO it's sufficient to try get rid of the error message in show and reply. BR, Jani.