Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04D3431FC2;
	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:54:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id kwzqBSrKO2oo; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:54:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11056431FAE;
	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:54:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id BEAD1254306; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:54:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
To: racin@free.fr, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
In-Reply-To: <1261148449.4b2b9921f3ab1@imp.free.fr>
References: <1261148449.4b2b9921f3ab1@imp.free.fr>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:54:27 -0800
Message-ID: <87eimsyxpo.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Subject: Re: [notmuch] First attempt to add smart completion in
 notmuch-search
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:54:29 -0000

--=-=-=

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:00:49 +0100, racin@free.fr wrote:
> Here is a first attempt to add "smart completion" to notmuch-search.

Hi Matthieu,

This all sounds quite interesting!

I look forward to actually seeing the patch. ;-)

-Carl

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLK8HT6JDdNq8qSWgRAilRAJ45BOPhxIrKCmT3oZbx4wQz2gFLBgCfcoK8
azFrL3nnvX5GvcApu0ghUpM=
=4nQ4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--