MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: awg@xvx.ca
In-Reply-To: <87r4uburt5.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
References: <20120515194455.B7AD5100646@guru.guru-group.fi>
	<878vgsbprq.fsf@nikula.org> <m23970bhre.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
	<CAMoJFUungAFPWy0d1Lh+rqmpK--P7MMEwNaewWHR=rbYo+BKsA@mail.gmail.com>
	<871umc1int.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
	<m27gw4nyfu.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
	<87r4uburt5.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 23:40:04 -0600
Message-ID:
 <CAMoJFUuE=0H4W7TX_ajwNEAeVEsD67XA4X_LHyDRapTnoOcUew@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: emacs complains about encoding?
From: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>
To: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Precedence: list

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> wrote:
>> I think the current plan is to use the same decoding lookup table that
>> notmuch-show is using in reply too.
>
> Which table do you refer to? notmuch-show-handlers-for?

Yep, that looks like the right thing.

I've been particularly busy with work and other things lately, so I
haven't had time to get this change done. If someone else wants to
work on this I'll be happy to review it; otherwise I'll try to get it
done in the next few weeks. Tomi's gnus-decoded fix went into 0.13.1
anyway, so I don't think the rest is particularly urgent.

-- Adam