Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9002431FBC for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:23:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.81 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.81 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.188, BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lea1OSxC9EvT for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:23:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [204.13.164.18]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8215431FAE for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:23:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: micah@mx1.riseup.net) with ESMTPSA id CF0FE25F320 Received: by lillypad (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8F5914A8167; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:23:55 -0500 (EST) From: micah anderson To: racin@free.fr, Sebastian Spaeth In-Reply-To: <1942218579.1190451265898054032.JavaMail.root@zimbra1-e1.priv.proxad.net> References: <1942218579.1190451265898054032.JavaMail.root@zimbra1-e1.priv.proxad.net> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:23:48 -0500 Message-ID: <876363adp7.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at mx1 X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [notmuch] notmuch.el: Prefix arg inverts the sort order of notmuch-search. X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:23:29 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:20:54 +0100 (CET), racin@free.fr wrote: > Using a prefix arg to invert search order would conflict with my patch > http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2009/000914.html in which the > prefix arg is used to show deleted messages. I don't known which > behaviour for prefix patch would be best. I always understood a prefix arg to invert the original (or provide a numeric repetition), but I do not have a wide sample to tell if this is how most elisp implements it.=20 > Though we can also add "toggle keys" that toggle search order, or > toggle display of deleted messages, which would solve the problem. There is the 'o' key now which toggles the search order, isn't there?=20 m --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJLdD0kAAoJEIy/mjIoYaeQUDkP/juwHOtmHr6fhOr2fEE9b3LL GILnPtCp7g/Z2NF2EdxE2eLxxjVxQB+mRgffu+a1js/b4evh9AihJi4nsEDqQkMD BebOZ7BvTYhF7aalydr3xnFa1L8XJcnUhljcF56zuAznSBbucI3btOdw/2q0nJCz jZyCHHgf2mhrLj+StuYFapN/nQv+uB26+fNRM8kWu01th1xK0qQ1yujANopoCcNI UwSLw4ehwzS1qsiDssm3feZjMyUNi6z5lbNxtcvKEkOyZgDM8jKXsFTK/kU4YOCc 5t1IO5lxVS/xMpW9W2WfEEGxmH4oKLNUmvHAlwbNCOSGB7uepLMW1MiRekKlwRp1 m1bEe3WZX9+M4ct9St8Rnk4q0/Y7Oe9OSo/OhYKHQDLPpYh04naIcvtKnkdbRbb4 4kCX71UBIsA1PTvahVFMQtcJlQRJtwp3r/GfpW8DI670ic0oyb2NEajDYUJk8z0f DZH0qvuSAXJDsWTtvUG1832zHcwPG/GCLwn7r90KgwRrMM5z2/bBPYD9mFLQAY3L P5CsLqZVlQKFQT+JLUXFdzjWa6kXaikPzMxLH60dcXqwEk9Io/mi3U8uTfUQVPtY C8iz9rmU3eJ43PuKMt7aLQnOZyuQnT0gQ+ka6Eoy+5Wbwt5DM/vZu6r+oZL1/Q2s TM/IRnu3UH/rV0JaeXsa =7HlT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--