Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A37B421192 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:40:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b8uONn7GNBqe for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:40:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.43.72.2]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62D442118E for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:40:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B479F29A852; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:40:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A591E2541A8; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:40:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: Robin Green , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: Preventing the user shooting themself in the foot In-Reply-To: <86iproe86u.fsf@greenrd.plus.com> References: <86iproe86u.fsf@greenrd.plus.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:40:40 -0700 Message-ID: <87fwms45xz.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:40:42 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:42:01 +0100, Robin Green wrote: > It's really dangerous to use the 'a' key in notmuch-mode in an inbox > thread which has multiple unread replies! Yes, the other unread replies > will still be tagged unread, but the user might not immediately be aware > of them. It would be really useful to have an optional warning ("More > unread messages in this thread, are you sure?") for this situation! That was why I originally designed the space bar keybinding for reading through each message in turn, (and then it archives the thread only when you page past the last message). The 'a' keybinding, (in turn), was designed for cases when you *know* you don't want to read the rest of the thread. That was the original idea behind these two, at least. In any case, it's doing exactly what it's defined to do. Perhaps you're just missing a key for archiving the current message (and advancing to the next)? I know there are various problems with the current keybindings=E2=80=94and several obviously-missing operations. And it's funny how long I've put up with shortcomings rather than just fixing them. I'll be glad to look at proposals for improving things. =2DCarl =2D-=20 carl.d.worth@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4LqegACgkQ6JDdNq8qSWgS2wCfVmb/l6ji6pkKZ0Bb77KR0K7N 6DEAn1yz8hL4NIJAxZYqUJijJ3NJ+bAC =HLEe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--