MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87bpismx21.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
References: <yun7htkcou6.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
	<87639122sx.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<yunhbslpv3q.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
	<87bpismx21.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:14:07 +0100
Message-ID: <f35dbb950911240414w14543aacoa57508ea28604e82@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jan Janak <jan@ryngle.com>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [notmuch] notmuch 'index' mode.
Precedence: list

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
> And notice, I don't think we'll need to do the "virtual tag" thing of
> associating a tag name with a search and doing the work of making
> notmuch maintain the consistency of that tag and search string. It will
> be much more clean (and shouldn't be any less fast) to just do the
> searches for the original search terms, (rather than searching for tag
> terms that were previously applied by searching for the search terms).
>
> Then tags become something that are just for manual manipulation. What
> do you think?

I like this. I think this is much cleaner than the "virtual tag" approach.

  -- Jan