Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40468429E35 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 00:56:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mokfZI6Zt7YO for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 00:56:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94DE2431FB6 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 00:56:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by werh12 with SMTP id h12so5735wer.26 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 00:56:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.131.224 with SMTP id m74mr472566wei.52.1326531406383; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 00:56:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([109.131.75.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ee6sm20787449wib.4.2012.01.14.00.56.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 14 Jan 2012 00:56:45 -0800 (PST) From: Pieter Praet To: David Bremner Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: cli: getting/setting/removing config values In-Reply-To: <87boq8nu9f.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <87y5tckf1y.fsf@praet.org> <1326389401-20468-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org> <87boq8nu9f.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+115~gadd29f6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:54:59 +0100 Message-ID: <8739bir7do.fsf@praet.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Notmuch Mail X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:56:48 -0000 On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:42:04 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:30:01 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > > Should have come before commit 1df71b55 > > This doesn't seem like an especially helpful commit > message. Editorializing is ok, I guess, but maybe keep it below the > '---' ? > You're right. The message I was trying to convey (quite tersely), was that these tests were written in response to commit 1df71b55 (and should probably be retroactively ran on 1df71b55~1). I realize now that it could potentially be wrongly interpreted as criticism of sorts, which of course wasn't my intention. Anyways, I ran the tests on both 1df71b55~1 and 1df71b55, and -as expected- everything checks out fine. Amended patch follows. > d Peace -- Pieter