Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24FB429E4A for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:46:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dS+79SLT5a11 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:46:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A092429E45 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:46:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by wibhr12 with SMTP id hr12so2322387wib.26 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:46:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.100.234 with SMTP id fb10mr14029384wib.5.1326714393891; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:46:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([109.131.75.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id di5sm33543325wib.3.2012.01.16.03.46.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:46:33 -0800 (PST) From: Pieter Praet To: David Edmondson , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Don't attempt to colour tags in `notmuch-show-mode'. In-Reply-To: References: <1325004434-24583-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> <87aa5nlwwg.fsf@praet.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+78~g6c58370 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:44:44 +0100 Message-ID: <8762gbvplf.fsf@praet.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:46:36 -0000 On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:22:27 +0000, David Edmondson wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:17:03 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > > Alas, those text properties actually *were* effective (and I liked them :) > > Well, not in emacs 24. My reading of the source was that overlays were > intended to stomp on text properties, but that could have been wrong. > > Do they look correct when you add/remove tags? Yup, they do; But I'm still chillin' with v23.3.1. No problem. For the time being, I'll just make do with reverting 4b256ff5 on my local branch. Peace -- Pieter