Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7A04196F2 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:37:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.8 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cv70jVjK8J77 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:37:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from convex-new.cs.unb.ca (convex-new.cs.unb.ca [131.202.245.35]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA1C431FC1 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:37:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bremner by convex-new.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O50L8-0000HI-BK; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:37:26 -0300 From: David Bremner To: Jameson Rollins , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: bug tracking In-Reply-To: <87d3xr8p6m.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <87d3xr8p6m.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:37:26 -0300 Message-ID: <87wrvz2xt5.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:37:28 -0000 On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:47:13 -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote: > I now think it is essential that we put together a bug tracker for > notmuch. Things are moving pretty quickly now, which is great, but as > the UI is frequently changing, I'm stumbling upon lots of little bugs. > As I don't have the time to stop what I'm doing and figure out patches > for them all, we really need some way to report and track issues. I > really think this is essential moving forward. > > I have used things like trac and redmine in the past and they work quite > well. I don't have any other useful suggestions. One of the newfangled > git-based distributed bug trackers could be cool, but I've never used > one, or gotten any feedback from anyone who has. > It was thinking along these lines that got me to make the following list http://www.cs.unb.ca/~bremner/blog/posts/git-issue-trackers/ If people think the general concept of a distributed bug tracker is worthwhile, I'm willing to investigate a more. Feel free to cc bremner-comment-blog~posts~git-issue-trackers@pivot.cs.unb.ca If you have comments about distributed bug trackers; this semi-automatically gets added to the comments page. So far, a few Debian people have endorsed "simple defects". d