Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C783E431FC0 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:27:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D3K+0SmDnU-7 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:27:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.211]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8236E431FBD for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:27:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from omta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.51]) by QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id NdRB1n00516LCl05BfThN1; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:27:41 +0000 Received: from odin.tremily.us ([24.18.63.50]) by omta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id NfTf1n00i152l3L3SfTg8B; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:27:41 +0000 Received: by odin.tremily.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 922E5FEA046; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:27:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tremily.us; s=odin; t=1391614058; bh=ylV38JWOX9ve1S1qCIS1rVNsEeaIlU4iV2SM8MY05y4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=R4JyS2J1JnDqUwvNWXavf3/hGaaDN7+W5Qgk5PtTnrf2LLiiDFY4XvFMwc+FrzPid Q3dMALbzrFYFRRnuJPVOH9dAEi0gNTVVHieeLTwI8a639itBXRvxPsj1+ObBYBajOr oQwejVux0QDG5s1dcy6gq9utzmz1WHX1Y9K50lN8= Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:27:38 -0800 From: "W. Trevor King" To: Tomi Ollila Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] nmbug-status: Python-3-compabitility and general refactoring Message-ID: <20140205152738.GJ14197@odin.tremily.us> References: <20140204005331.GQ14197@odin.tremily.us> <20140204161142.GS14197@odin.tremily.us> <20140204191453.GV14197@odin.tremily.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BipTYHwbFd8z9jk5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: OpenPGP: id=39A2F3FA2AB17E5D8764F388FC29BDCDF15F5BE8; url=http://tremily.us/pubkey.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1391614061; bh=cbinuySvRC6S5kY87XN1Tin3067mdPKbayy6KpahiEY=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kH7HmQCdZtZwLmQpHVdMcZqXif2saP2AMeW002APj8CNZOzPF2bAryGva003O4Maz 6hi7FrkXj9D/3YOhq7PMhV2tbSl4GE8Lqh6VNi6npQq8W20nOnaJAbT9FcbDBODenN gXHKSLYhmZBdNU//u3I6TyUq7SXjLHGdEkaciIDcL4GCRPbqXX54IXwO6AESNeq7jQ GIzx/0VWBouSXHwkSJ3jvxqKcn08GdWhWKSv1aKR52SlOLbib5owPszRGj9XJh6cxO EfMtOYs1msMFncyErARlxK+stMCqPs28Lgl7+ASW3GCsIeXw2jDyziVMGi5iHqVkVw NSF1pS9qeWhYQ== Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:27:47 -0000 --BipTYHwbFd8z9jk5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 05:00:45PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > After I fixed the wrapper the program works fine on python 2.6.6. :) > now every other thread is background-colored (girly) pink (fef?) > and every other light blue (eff). for me the light blue is not > visible (there are no body background color set?) #EFF is visible to me, but it is light. > #DFF for the light-blue works better for me. I'm fine with that. As I said in my cover letter, I'm happy to have alternative color schemes suggested. Does anyone else want to chime in on better defaults? This should probably also be configurable via status-config.json. Maybe: { "style": {"html": {"thread-colors": ["#DFF", "#FEF"]}}} ? > I think rounded corners are nice but IMHO the round radius is too > big -- using 0.5mm for the radius would IMHO be better. No problem. Cheers, Trevor --=20 This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy --BipTYHwbFd8z9jk5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS8lhnAAoJEKKfehoaNkbtlSAP/jeIiXzD5O3SVY3wZKR6P0oD B/stEouGULXD/x9K0zbSeRcswGzMPLeCTrRkMw8dJMEe1L7mg7ABebQKnboSvq0H hqZ0c7ftvLq0RUlWNBTV0tRl/CfSa7C2sC4sHJq8gzQv9uS6zpFZfSkhU70aDaR9 OcJqrq0+02lsglo4jK5MVuh8p8RHVYwNcn+IQ6Oafr9neaCBev8kzL6ICMYAp+sS ZyDh7wFf8Hd0qHWQO71iQqpL6MtpYsR3KXkByMkxuEFf1bA1x6wlenNzjQuCpA9Z aMXq5J2XtPmE7SCWMWwAaZYK+MIE+MASP/H0w4QJKiwX+pIyuUv4a/4U5T9FygUJ 5A52kOLK53NmIMP7FjwLVuEzIZCx2YY/XauhVvEbKU2ITEVbt75MUQen9x4/49CY WpqI6crLFcZEY6lD5flwyx+sbSbaK4IgSDspoBLV+AmQ0Eze3fqID7dErMuXP6Sx 6eqyslEPpe7eDCbLUU8qMnYTFSRYBMigDzdlGnwhWRYo1/KS0DQmA2jDmbg6/MKI HPRVkLfHKbYlSFp06Hqw4HMWT41Qb/ZJL8dYAinA/Qw7eQGyRdwWFHesSsaO9rYT ytKwAjVfjfjM3j1Ps4dzrN7XrkEMTXwUKN71TGnGXQ1zVVeQLdqRptpb7KGCcAfz BiZEY7O/4bGZ3ZZbrw7O =d1fb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BipTYHwbFd8z9jk5--