Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:00:38 +1300
From: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
To: David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca>
Message-ID: <20100210220038.GG16186@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
Mail-Followup-To: David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
References: <87636u34lw.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87d411zvz8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<20100125213231.GB15987@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
	<960df8f6a8a08f2ca3aceef5a216d691.squirrel@webmail.sspaeth.de>
	<87wrz4fqsw.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net>
	<20100127194149.GA23034@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
	<20100128070522.GA18649@ukfsn.org>
	<20100201223112.GA20288@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
	<20100210032503.GA19427@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
	<87tytpjx0x.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87tytpjx0x.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [notmuch] patchwork test instance
Precedence: list

also sprach David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca> [2010.02.10.2149 +1300]:
> I'm not sure what merging patches means here; some kind of squash
> operation?  Anyway it seemed to me that every every patch series
> that I looked at was broken into individual patches. Maybe I am
> just unlucky, or does patchwork really not understand the concept
> of series of patches in a thread?

I don't think it does, this is what bundles are for, but these need
to be created manually at the moment. Patch series are pretty easy
to detect, so maybe the bundle could be automatically generated.

http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/patchwork/2010-February/000226.html

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
because light travels faster than sound,
some people appear to be intelligent,
until you hear them speak.
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net