Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52050431FAF for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:01:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sN9c-YUwuHY0 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:01:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E79CE431FAE for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:01:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnsUE-0002Yq-QC; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:01:38 -0400 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TnsU9-0008OW-7j; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:01:33 -0400 From: David Bremner To: Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: show: make id links respect window In-Reply-To: <87mwx2jsu0.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> References: <1355958602-16752-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> <87bodjfnt0.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87mwx2jsu0.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+213~g4af1ac6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:01:33 -0400 Message-ID: <87bodgrh6a.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam_bar: - X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:01:44 -0000 Mark Walters writes: >> I can imagine that people would want/like the "open in other window" >> effect of the current code, even if the reason is a bug. > > That's definitely possible. I generally expect a mouse click to select > the window I click and this feels counter intuitive. I think that some > people might like an option "open this link in a new window" but I would > guess that would like that whether they clicked or pressed RET on the > button. I don't care much either way myself, but before we change notmuch-show behaviour (effectively) to accomodate notmuch-pick, I'd like a bit more feedback from other people. d