Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0086DE19AD for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2016 11:33:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.678 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.026, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OgpZcqhVTc4L for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2016 11:32:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939FB6DE192C for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2016 11:32:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E2E10008D; Fri, 1 Jan 2016 21:33:16 +0200 (EET) From: Tomi Ollila To: "W. Trevor King" Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] nmbug-status: h1 title and unbalanced

fixups to default templates In-Reply-To: <20160101174352.GP3680@odin.tremily.us> References: <20151231164312.GJ3680@odin.tremily.us> <20160101174352.GP3680@odin.tremily.us> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+32~g73439f8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 19:33:00 -0000 On Fri, Jan 01 2016, "W. Trevor King" wrote: > On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 01:30:57PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: >> yes, I have old tidy (20091203), and the complaints were about >> utf8-characters (being invalid) in output and=20 > > UTF-8 should be valid, because we declare the charset in: > > > > If you feel like the UTF-8 complaints are valid, can you post more > details about them? IMO UTF-8 complaints are INvalid ! i.e. everything ok there. Tomi >> =E2=80=A6 summary attribute missing in tables=E2=80=A6 > > This attribute seems like it's obsolete [1]. I believe that :D i.e. everything looks ok to me. Tomi > > Cheers, > Trevor > > [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/obsolete.html#attr-table-summary >