Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D434413FE8
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  8 Jan 2012 08:11:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.7
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 6u7Od2aFOTxc for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sun,  8 Jan 2012 08:11:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com
 [74.125.83.53])	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))	(No client
 certificate requested)	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
 B5DA2413FEC	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  8 Jan 2012 08:11:13 -0800
 (PST)
Received: by eekd41 with SMTP id d41so2373928eek.26
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:11:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.28.193 with SMTP id n1mr976763ebc.43.1326039072213;
	Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:11:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-fe5cdc00-23.dhcp.inet.fi.
	[80.220.92.23]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
	y12sm277472800eeb.11.2012.01.08.08.11.09
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:11:10 -0800 (PST)
From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org,
	david@tethera.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add the option "--reply-to" to notmuch reply.
In-Reply-To: <87y5tiqljv.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
References: <8739btdkir.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
	<1325856857-15969-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
	<871urafjiy.fsf@nikula.org> <87y5tiqljv.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+182~g93862a2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 18:11:08 +0200
Message-ID: <871urarx7n.fsf@nikula.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:11:14 -0000

On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:08:20 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think replying to an email which we sent and which does not have any
> other person on the to: line is sufficiently rare that it doesn't really
> matter what we do in this case.

I ended up fixing all of this properly. I'm hoping to send the patches
later today so you can have a look - the code will do a better job of
explaining itself than I'd do now. :)

BR,
Jani.