Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F64431FBF for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 03:02:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u6EGEimIVNBU for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 03:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CE24431FBD for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 03:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wa0C2-0001AJ-VF; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 07:02:18 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 21365 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:02:15 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: remove auto-signing of replies to signed messages In-Reply-To: <1397504450-15498-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> References: <87mwfnd9eh.fsf@tethera.net> <1397504450-15498-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+195~gc2048ad (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 07:02:15 -0300 Message-ID: <87ob02x654.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:02:30 -0000 Jameson Graef Rollins writes: > It was decided that auto-signing is potentially too troublesome for the > apparently common case of users who enable crypto processing for the > purpose of checking signature validity but who are not in a position to > sign out-going messages. Users can still manually invoke signing as needed. pushed d