Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5955F429E25 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:42:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4WJUxhBfHk8J for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:42:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D48431FB6 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:42:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A1866E009D; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:42:56 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-174-136-149.socal.res.rr.com [76.174.136.149]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8800E66E00E5; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:42:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 728BE33C; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:42:53 -0800 (PST) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: David Bremner , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Modify notmuch-show-get-message-id to return message-id unprefixed with "id:". In-Reply-To: <87pqgxmlz0.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca> References: <87mxdabyy8.fsf@washington.ligo-wa.caltech.edu> <1318199748-25058-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <87pqgxmlz0.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9+131~g8fb8eec (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:42:50 -0800 Message-ID: <87lirldnl1.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 21:42:57 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:52:51 -0500, David Bremner wrote: > What do you think about the approach in >=20 > id:"1309422050-23241-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org" >=20 > I sortof like the idea of having with and without prefix bindings. That seems like a totally reasonable solution to me. > Or maybe we could provide a prefix argument (getit? ;) ) so that C-u c i > adds the prefix. I'd rather just use a separate key ("I") instead of getting into the whole prefix business. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOvuhbAAoJEO00zqvie6q8YkMQAJz0sLCmWPCkT6z5AUfrPjKN NcnrzFtW/0sfGfO8a50XbdIHv5UbmXz0Y5dCCWQpAQiLiKkAzuyIyTeHiCZ818U9 UatJbwH1IQojk1rtyEFLyCozd8KrMry6JGROPcA2S9MmFx2JnlmtnKenui35NLmX 0zfbQ/adXEoBZXS2ValhWpTx8WRe9PaTaTDlt3hTHnHQCdWvyPiBmP6a0qcEMHhu qPygwtBZkzOuxVZKURF+ZUjFO0+9eRqsE/XVeo/dHpNdP1QvzZPskEJo60ncesZJ 61/mcNXPH8RrEp7AAfm9DfpsLXe1D8XegfFzOkyth9cJUeewX10HEOAGC2vHdfOi bhjmCNKmdE5CBXBpbUGfJ1O6LvWuV0mE0smnn+LobjeHGsqiR0DYkMpP1eYDmCwR 1KQBA1K1YSqPsDI87ewU5CdczFcgKZlOjna17Hq1X/UxHG2b+W+hC+KGOWhj2u/1 g45BK0vozzWS+0/8vQ8/5Z6hQfNr/MeIK4jJ9E7dJ0NvzymYX0L0Xvdwk9JmESqp bsxDw5RRuCa1JJja1HwAszTKxWV0Pk4dYJyMXW6KFqMxe+Pp5wjNwmlAm3fIu+J6 k9oejzJwlC0Vw3GD8/Wvq28l7V6DXhotvaIWgHFAkfuu8k//+9k07EVionlrDCCV 6iX7lkmawMhFjX9g1yru =owAG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--