Return-Path: <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95F84196F3
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.701
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
	DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001]
	autolearn=ham
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id KvG5V5MQgeBC for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f180.google.com (mail-qy0-f180.google.com
	[209.85.221.180])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0127C4196F2
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so4376869qyk.6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:subject
	:to:in-reply-to:references;
	bh=/Sj2EdlkhFkRuPDzP/pHSO0KeHflLTYHZMzheu464ZE=;
	b=JeUCoVqIFDoxXLEfTDSnHpyWrm8pnApQJRQivA65sTnO7dDL6UQozeIh+00ht8rLC9
	2fwy6fkIT7MG2iGGL5UcapWT9kqXWHIt2c4jI41Caz0UY7eGPKllMHg0fjRQTqjKXE6C
	es7NHCvt407AsAMhG8pIeB2hpIplCpqrpo4ds=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:subject:to:in-reply-to:references;
	b=tOL4joDhXD9tbPqvDLHgD7VWyAZ6Mp0nXgISTAAT6mxO4EFrSvp0W2np33TbDp42CF
	tqRkJjlOHpdMr7COOreKHNhgIdi9twsIigQZqpelOWPtQItaz6Z5UKR7T7Ui//TzXjzW
	jO6N1EczRSMOBITXzLIPZGBCBrLG28PGEnMm4=
Received: by 10.229.233.139 with SMTP id jy11mr1815327qcb.38.1269743285035;
	Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (pool-96-236-124-222.spfdma.east.verizon.net
	[96.236.124.222])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm1610612qyk.11.2010.03.27.19.28.03
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
	Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4baebeb3.9753f10a.6e95.5e56@mx.google.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
In-Reply-To: <1268432006-24333-2-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
References: <1268432006-24333-1-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
	<1268432006-24333-2-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch-config: make new message tags
	configurable
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 02:28:07 -0000

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:13:26 -0500, Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com> wrote:
> Add a new_tags option in the [messages] section of the configuration
> file to allow the user to specify which tags should be added to new
> messages by notmuch new.

Would anyone oppose this being merged? I've been running with it on a daily
basis for the last two weeks and I've had no issues. The migration path is
quite clean as the current behavior is the default.

- Ben