From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
To: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>,
	Notmuch list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: User-Agent header
In-Reply-To: <87iq7ubhrj.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
References: <87iq821hba.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87hbnhprk0.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
	<87y6gtnkch.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87bpdnl02k.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<87iq7ubhrj.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:52:57 -0700
Message-ID: <87aat4fq7a.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:44:16 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.d=
e> wrote:
> On 2010-04-13, Carl Worth wrote:
> > No, wait! I want more from you. :-)
>=20
> Sigh, they always want more :-)

Sorry about that. :-)

> See the "sister mail" to this thread, in which I simply added the whole
> shebang to notmuch.el (not using a lambda function). Is that what you
> had in mind.

Yes, that looks pretty good. But David has some improvements in mind,
this feature was implemented after the 0.2 merge window closed, *and*
I've committed to David to not keep messing with the emacs code before
merging in his outstanding changes.

So I'm going to wait on this for now at least.

> Is that "version" really needed, BTW? Why can't notmuch --version not jus=
t say:
> notmuch 0.1-107-g553feae

Good point. I think I was imitating the "git --version" output or
something. I can't give any reason for this though. I'll fix this.

=2DCarl

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLx26Z6JDdNq8qSWgRAvD/AJ9nHQJu6aEGko49WiDJvyIwG9Yi2ACdGGu5
CBfNaL1infrgOBtziD3P5o4=
=5W2Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--