Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18718431FBD for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:01:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DTEjGFFtWA1A for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ks3536.kimsufi.com (schnouki.net [87.98.217.222]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAAD431FB6 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from odin.local (nancy.schnouki.net [78.238.0.45]) by ks3536.kimsufi.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 470EE74000A; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:01:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=schnouki.net; s=key-schnouki; t=1340902904; bh=cn2kV3nRgZod9D2NWuj0N6sBYkXr0mFGWUYnodhLNeM=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=hLrdEBhv69FdE86CdAowvksOtBwozWv9s1eZDSI3q9ow9spUqauFfmWQpHs7OfNPQ 9WFz7UsjIL4Buz7ZYqM3VzWlreWjs6+3Zh2VucbeY42LKTYUO5bcXEThbpuiqcAhqn SHLecJnR07ZW6oFS3wOdxDU2BiuZ5TQ5kr8LQIYg= From: Thomas Jost To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Philip Hands , Jesse Rosenthal , David Bremner , Carl Worth , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restore original keybinding ('r' = reply-to-all) In-Reply-To: <87fw9fwgp4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <1340815565-21083-1-git-send-email-cworth@cworth.org> <87obo4zljq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87hatwqoz9.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <87ehozmpcq.fsf@jhu.edu> <87hatv4e37.fsf@poker.hands.com> <87fw9fwgp4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13~rc1+15~gc7c546b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.1.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:01:37 +0200 Message-ID: <8762abs74e.fsf@schnouki.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:01:45 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 28 juin 2012 =C3=A0 18:21 CEST, Jameson Graef Rollins a =C3=A9crit : > On Thu, Jun 28 2012, Philip Hands wrote: >> Actually, instead of either of these options, how about some way of >> letting r do the single reply, and then once inside the reply, having >> some key binding to add the rest of the recipients in the group, or flip >> between the two options so one can change one's mind after typing up the >> reply? > > This is a good idea. The other idea I had was to have 'r' query the > user directly about whether or not they want to reply all before > constructing the reply template. Or right before you're about to send. In my config, I use "r a" for "reply to all" and "r s" for "reply to sender". Never got it wrong since I added this to my .emacs. https://github.com/Schnouki/dotfiles/blob/master/emacs/init-50-mail.el#L111= -114 Regards, =2D-=20 Thomas/Schnouki --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP7I31AAoJEOQWxbmv9eBxfJYIAKIX9sWLBl9r/qdL3QXFkRav wW5DCqNtqicBmQH9cSJBSPtX0arp+92U8Pv2xUCFKocLwoKEacYGmZcVcNNxRwG4 E+tacMRkWRt/7uaBTV9n6agXiKBRgz42qroIVZTmgxY3SRn/vvEYLzbERNyooMfS mSd3qtk2hIq5hCC1xp3oue23bLSHH9EoPJc7PqzBPAzojOR2gu29XYPW/fRf3xO6 YdAuBoWGnPI5s96b2t9e+InZx6bxOHNKx8QHzi08KWWuC/JOu+MPstBfrNzCAsZ5 VHUBp8Urp7sAxA9mAhrGWQz6JspXFfsepj8S1j3Gq62SyAjh6qGS2edohjwceGQ= =/1S9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--