Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4D2431FBC for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:43:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cpydlHEv2VQv for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:43:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB19431FAE for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:43:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.space2u.com ([62.20.1.135]) by mx.perfora.net (node=mxus2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Mg4Vh-1NZEwv2YSL-00NKrf for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:43:13 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f224.google.com (mail-bw0-f224.google.com [209.85.218.224]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail1.space2u.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nALKgp8S019011 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:42:51 +0100 Received: by bwz24 with SMTP id 24so3123001bwz.30 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:43:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.153.217 with SMTP id l25mr2733744bkw.108.1258836189283; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:43:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <874oon4pgv.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <87fx87u3no.fsf@59A2.org> <874oon4pgv.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:43:09 +0100 Message-ID: From: Karl Wiberg To: Carl Worth Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [notmuch] Asynchronous tagging X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:43:14 -0000 On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Carl Worth wrote: > Does offlineimap use tmp while it's delivering message and then move > things to new? If so, then maybe all we need to do to fix notmuch to not > look into tmp directories? That's probably the right thing to do regardless---IIRC, the tmp directory exists so that processes can put messages there while they are writing them, and then do an atomic rename to the new (or cur) directory. -- Karl Wiberg, kha@treskal.com subrabbit.wordpress.com www.treskal.com/kalle