Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4E7431FB6 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 06:31:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SqeyzoP6dE+o for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 06:31:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.sflc.info (mail.sflc.info [207.86.247.70]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1A77431FAE for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 06:31:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (unknown [74.113.160.38]) by mail.sflc.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82F4CB4C018; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 14:31:53 +0000 (UTC) From: James Vasile To: David Bremner Subject: Re: [PATCH] don't show x-foo tags in search view In-Reply-To: <871ug5k2g1.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <87fw4x3y3e.fsf@hackervisions.org> <87liepw0b4.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> <87625tc6xd.fsf@hackervisions.org> <20121030005700.GE15377@mit.edu> <87390w57oo.fsf@hackervisions.org> <871ug5k2g1.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+96~gb732e1b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:15:34 -0500 Message-ID: <87390ljy7t.fsf@jamesvasile.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: notmuch mailing list X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:31:56 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David Bremner writes: > James Vasile writes: > >> Austin, >> >> Thanks for the helpful comments. I redid the patch to take a list of >> regexps. That way users can banish different kinds of tags or simply >> list the tags themselves. I've responded to your comments in text below >> the patch. >> > > I think the patch is probably OK now contentwise, but the commit message > is what I quoted above, which is not ideal.=20=20 New commit message: This patch hides any tags in search view that match the regexps specified in the list `notmuch-search-hide-tag-regexps`. The match is case-insensitive. An empty list (which is the default) will disable hiding of tags in search view. The list can be set via setq or the customize interface. To hide all tags that begin with "x-" or "X-", set `notmuch-search-hide-tag-regexps` to "^X-". > > As far as being obsoleted by Damien's labeller patches, let's cross that > bridge when we come to it. Unless somebody objects, I'd be willing to > push some version of this now. Thanks. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQmm0GAAoJECaDklOuuidYBigH/3mVIrTJrdjBkBz+GM+syg6Q ZW5c73oyDMAInTc0us1GpOaWK0l4tiMz4uVDyibT6L/ncdwpibXzHARN6xphi6yC JVPvHBEgEIbLC3/+QDETRoqG4x32WE3+/+B8EilPOr2s0cG8FdTtQWuIf0opWlz7 nAlgTyVtrIFhxO79IHXXv0BY9lBWdJLsuap747HVooitgzEVOZac90Ccr3B5tKsn ZquBIhOwUETwTwuv4FJa4a8S0eCqEAUvQ9+rT7Ro0WBO/lrAoJXy/o/anRuIJR8j AUltsZ5yXNUPj2wm6li0abiYRBr10TqW8TvZUf4mZrE6WiyrZHSdsI9HfH6v7WI= =X1jy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--