Return-Path: <bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137D6431FBC
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:53:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id Qh+SYBf5ggGA for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:53:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pivot.cs.unb.ca (pivot.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.57])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76061431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:53:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from
	fctnnbsc30w-142167182194.pppoe-dynamic.high-speed.nb.bellaliant.net
	([142.167.182.194] helo=localhost)
	by pivot.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca>)
	id 1NO9fw-0004W5-8O; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 08:53:48 -0400
Received: from bremner by localhost with local (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca>)
	id 1NO9fq-0004Co-PQ; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 08:53:42 -0400
From: David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca>
To: Scott Robinson <scott@quadhome.com>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
In-Reply-To: <1261161923-sup-6874@lisa>
References: <87iqcapijl.fsf@pivot.cs.unb.ca>
	<87k4wp2noq.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87skbdcfu3.fsf@pivot.cs.unb.ca>
	<1261114167-sup-8228@lisa> <87k4wkyyro.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<1261161923-sup-6874@lisa>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 08:53:42 -0400
Message-ID: <87ws0btdt5.fsf@pivot.cs.unb.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Sender-Verified: bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca
Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] JSON output for notmuch-search and
 notmuch-show.
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 12:53:50 -0000

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:47:33 -0800, Scott Robinson <scott@quadhome.com> wrote:

> Resubmit a full patch, or submit another one on top of it?

My own feeling is that in general if a patch hasn't been merged into
master, and the changes don't form a separate logical change (i.e. "oh,
if you take that patch, you could have this feature too"), then
resubmitting makes the most sense. This also provides a chance to rebase
against master.

Of course, if I'm way off base here, please (notmuch list readers) let
me know.

David